Cardiology Research, ISSN 1923-2829 print, 1923-2837 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Cardiol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.cardiologyres.org

Original Article

Volume 12, Number 3, June 2021, pages 193-200


Contradictory Effect of Coronary Collateral Circulation on Regional Myocardial Perfusion That Assessed by Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy

Figure

Figure 1.
Figure 1. An example of patient. (a) Proximal right RCA with 100% total stenosis (blue arrow) and Rentrop 3 collateral flow to the RCA from LAD (red arrow). (b) Myocardial perfusion bull’s eye image of the same patient shows infarction and minimal ischemia on the inferior wall (yellow arrows). LAD: left artery descending; RCA: right coronary artery.

Tables

Table 1. Demographic and Clinical Parameters of Groups
 
Clinical characteristicsPatients cohort (n = 96)P value
Not-well-developed collateral group (n = 58)Well-developed collateral group (n = 38)
*P < 0.05. CAD: coronary artery disease.
The mean age (years)64.05 ± 10.1361.71 ± 11.690.300
Gender, n (%)
  Male41 (70.7)28 (73.7)0.750
  Female17 (29.3)10 (26.3)
Body mass index (kg/m2)28.14 ± 4.3129.34 ± 4.760.211
Comorbidities
  Diabetes mellitus, n (%)29 (50.0)11 (28.9)0.041*
  Hypertension, n (%)23 (39.7)15 (39.5)0.986
  Hyperlipidemia, n (%)33 (57.9)20 (52.6)0.613
  Smoking, n (%)28 (48.3)19 (50.0)0.869
  Family history of CAD, n (%)32 (55.2)24 (63.2)0.438
Cardiac drugs
  Antihypertensive23 (39.7)15 (39.5)0.986
  Beta blocker50 (86.2)31 (81.5)0.516
  Vasodilators18 (31.0)11 (28.9)0.828
Coronary angiography
  Rentrop 0 (n)52-
  Rentrop 1 (n)6-
  Rentrop 2 (n)-24
  Rentrop 3 (n)-14

 

Table 2. The Statistics of Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy Findings in the Current Patients
 
Myocardial perfusion gated SPECT imaging parametersPatients cohort (n = 96)P value
Not-well-developed collateral group (n = 58)Well-developed collateral group (n = 38)
*P < 0.05. SPECT: single-photon emission computerized tomography; QPS: Quantitative Perfusion SPECT; QGS: Quantitative Gated SPECT; SSS: summed stress score; SDS: summed difference score; SMS: summed motion score; EF: ejection fraction; TID: transient ischemic dilation; PP: peak phase; PSD: phase standard deviation; PHB: phase histogram bandwidth.
QPS and QGS
  SSS = perfusion damage score14.16 ± 6.4115.03 ± 6.960.531
  SDS = ischemia score7.29 ± 3.267.63 ± 3.590.634
  SMS = motion damage score11.78 ± 6.4711.84 ± 7.890.964
  Stress EF (%)53.21 ± 5.6354.05 ± 6.310.495
  Left ventricular mass (g)128.32 ± 17.65137.18 ± 14.360.011*
  Left ventricular mass index (g/m2)68.96 ± 10.2973.08 ± 10.400.059
  TID1.11 ± 0.171.06 ± 0.130.158
Phase analysis (desynchronization scores)
  PP147.05 ± 24.19138.55 ± 20.000.075
  PSD35.07 ± 16.5728.53 ± 15.080.053
  PHB69.82 ± 34.2257.56 ± 29.550.074

 

Table 3. The Statistics of Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy Findings in the Current Patient’s Subgroups Divided by Coronary Arteries
 
Gated myocardial perfusion scintigraphy parametersCoronary artery subgroups (patients n = 96, coronary artery n = 116a)P value
Group1 (not-well-developed collateral group)Group 2 (well-developed collateral group)
Subgroup LAD1 (n = 30)Subgroup CX1 (n = 20)Subgroup RCA1 (n = 26)Subgroup LAD2 (n = 15)Subgroup CX1 (n = 10)Subgroup RCA2 (n = 15)
aSome patients had stenosis in more than one coronary artery. SSS: summed stress score; SDS: summed difference score; SMS: summed motion score; EF: ejection fraction; TID: transient ischemic dilation; PP: peak phase; PSD: phase standard deviation; PHB: phase histogram bandwidth; LAD: left artery descending; CX: circumflex artery; RCA: right coronary artery.
QPS and QGS
  SSS = perfusion damage score8.33 ± 4.709.43 ± 3.389.65 ± 3.958.00 ± 2.928.89 ± 2.579.13 ± 4.47Subgroup LAD 0.809
Subgroup CX 0.553
Subgroup RCA 0.873
  SDS = ischemia score3.11 ± 1.513.54 ± 1.153.79 ± 1.352.98 ± 1.023.02 ± 1.033.98 ± 1.26Subgroup LAD 0.815
Subgroup CX 0.455
Subgroup RCA 0.756
  SMS = motion damage score6.67 ± 4.107.95 ± 3.588.58 ± 2.945.00 ± 2.566.33 ± 4.095.93 ± 3.15Subgroup LAD 0.083
Subgroup CX 0.097
Subgroup RCA 0.102
  Stress EF (%)52.77 ± 6.3651.40 ± 6.2852.38 ± 5.7954.47 ± 5.5254.10 ± 7.1554.67 ± 5.80Subgroup LAD 0.537
Subgroup CX 0.231
Subgroup RCA 0.314
  Left ventricular mass (g)133.40 ± 21.95133.60 ± 14.68129.11 ± 16.29137.20 ± 11,57136.30 ± 15.64134.73 ± 14.87Subgroup LAD 0.462
Subgroup CX 0.475
Subgroup RCA 0.253
  Left ventricular mass index (g/m2)70.76 ± 10.6269.46 ± 10.4170.08 ± 12.2672.46 ± 11.0373.45 ± 9.3469.83 ± 8.45Subgroup LAD 0.485
Subgroup CX 0.328
Subgroup RCA 0.640
  TID1.12 ± 0.151.11 ± 0.181.13 ± 0.181.05 ± 0.101.04 ± 0.091.05 ± 0.13Subgroup LAD 0.126
Subgroup CX 0.230
Subgroup RCA 0.184
Phase analysis (desynchronization)
  PP151.03 ± 28.10144.15 ± 24.58146.69 ± 21.37140.60 ± 17.12135.70 ± 24.16137.73 ± 14.73Subgroup LAD 0.219
Subgroup CX 0.328
Subgroup RCA 0.121
  PSD34.21 ± 18.9436.60 ± 21.3436.27 ± 16.4626.80 ± 12.4528.58 ± 15.9830.34 ± 11.30Subgroup LAD 0.295
Subgroup CX 0.301
Subgroup RCA 0.221
  PHD70.03 ± 35.0984.05 ± 44.6565.53 ± 25.0852.33 ± 16.1466.60 ± 43.0855.03 ± 20.87Subgroup LAD 0.135
Subgroup CX 0.091
Subgroup RCA 0.165