Cardiology Research, ISSN 1923-2829 print, 1923-2837 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Cardiol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.cardiologyres.org

Original Article

Volume 12, Number 6, December 2021, pages 340-343


Rate of Recovery of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in a Real-World Population of Patients Receiving a Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator

Figure

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis. “Pre-Vest EF” refers to baseline EF prior to placement of wearable cardioverter defibrillator. EF: ejection fraction; AOR: adjusted odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

Tables

Table 1. Patient Characteristics
 
All (n = 101) (%)EF recovered (n = 39) (%)EF non-recovered (n = 62) (%)
EF: ejection fraction; HF: heart failure.
Age, mean (years)61 ± 12.361± 13.262 ± 11.8
Gender, female38 (38)19 (49)19 (31)
Ischemic cardiomyopathy, n (%)51 (50)19 (49)32 (52)
Nonischemic cardiomyopathy, n (%)50 (50)20 (51)30 (48)
Average number of HF medications2 ± 1.02 ± 1.02 ± 1.0

 

Table 2. Patients Stratified According to Initial EF
 
< 15% (n = 10) (%)15-20% (n = 17) (%)20-25% (n = 27) (%)25-30% (n = 20) (%)30-35% (n = 22) (%)35-40% (n = 5) (%)
EF: ejection fraction; HF: heart failure; ICD: implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
Age, mean (years)53 ± 9.859 ± 13.765 ± 10.463 ± 13.460 ± 11.362 ± 16.3
Gender, female4 (40)6 (35)9 (33)8 (40)8 (36)3 (60)
Ischemic cardiomyopathy3 (30)9 (53)12 (44)8 (40)15 (68)4 (80)
Average number of HF medications2 ± 0.92 ± 1.032 ± 0.92 ± 0.91.9 ± 1.251.2 ± 0.8
EF improved ≥ 35-40%2 (2)3 (18)9 (33)10 (50)10 (45)5 (100)
ICD eventually implanted3 (30)9 (53)11 (41)9 (45)8 (36)1 (20)