Cardiology Research, ISSN 1923-2829 print, 1923-2837 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Cardiol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.cardiologyres.org

Original Article

Volume 3, Number 4, August 2012, pages 180-186


Endothelial Function and Carotid Intimal Medial Thickness in Asymptomatic Subjects With and Without Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Tables

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Study Group (n = 104)
 
VariableWithout Risk factors (n = 50 )With risk factors (n = 54)P value
BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, LDL cholesterol; HDL-C, HDL cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HbAIc, glycosylated hemoglobin; FBS, fasting blood sugar; PPBS, post-prandial blood sugar. (All variables expressed as Mean ± SD).
Age (years)39.98 ± 11.1842.55 ± 9.900.216
Male: Female ratio1.38:11.84:1-
BMI (kg/m2)21.98 ± 1.2924.45 ± 3.58< 0.001
SBP (mm Hg)109.32 ± 9.85139.18 ± 15.55< 0.001
DBP (mm Hg)72.08 ± 5.7587.03 ± 9.44< 0.001
Creatinine (mg/dL)0.89 ± 0.111.03 ± 1.100.347
TC (mg/dL)168.06 ± 10.9188.25 ± 25.95< 0.001
LDL-C (mg/dl)97.58 ± 11.0117.47 ± 24.73< 0.001
HDL-C (mg/dl)43.82 ± 2.8641.05 ± 3.84< 0.001
TG (mg/dL)133.24 ± 8.26159.31 ± 78.45< 0.001
Hb AIc (%)5.69 ± 0.306.80 ± 1.04< 0.001
FBS (mg/dL)95.82 ± 7.20112.25 ± 23.37< 0.001
PPBS (mg/dL)123.84 ± 8.21177.35 ± 67.70< 0.001

 

Table 2. Risk Factors (n = 54)
 
Risk factorNumber ( percentage )
Diabetes mellitus23 (43%)
Hypertension29 (54%)
Dyslipidemia23 (43%)
Smoking4 (7%)
Obesity23 (43%)
Metabolic syndrome14 (26%)
Physical inactivity6 (11%)
Family h/o premature CAD9 (17%)

 

Table 3. FMD Response and Carotid IMT in Both Groups
 
VariableWithout Risk factorsWith risk factorsP value
FMD Response (percentage change)13.18 ± 2.386.53 ± 4.19< 0.001
Carotid IMT (mm)0.67 ± 0.050.78 ± 0.12< 0.001

 

Table 4. FMD Response of the Study Population
 
GroupFMD of brachial arteryTotalχ2P-Value
Normal ResponseAbnormal Response
*denotes significant difference. It is observed that there is a significant association between the FMD response and the risk factors (P < 0.001). Higher numbers of samples without risk factors have a normal FMD response whereas more number of samples with risk factors have an abnormal FMD response.
Without Risk Factors4645041.948< 0.001*
With Risk Factors163854
Total6242104

 

Table 5. Carotid IMT of the Study Population
 
Carotid IMTTotalχ2P-Value
NormalIncreased
*denotes significant difference. It is observed that there is a significant association between the IMT thickness and the risk factors (P < 0.001). Even though higher number of samples with and without risk factors have a normal IMT, more number of samples with risk factors have an increased IMT.
Without Risk Factors482507.4000.007*
With Risk Factors421254
Total9014104

 

Table 6. Correlation of IMT and FMD With Variables
 
FactorCarotid IMTFMD
r%r%
TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, LDL cholesterol; HDL-C, HDL cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; BMI, body mass index; HbAIc, glycosylated hemoglobin. *denotes significant correlation.
Age0.651< 0.001*-0.3200.001*
TC0.525< 0.001*-0.557< 0.001*
LDL-C0.503< 0.001*-0.566< 0.001*
HDL-C-0.2670.006*0.341< 0.001*
TG0.2890.003*-0.2780.004*
SBP0.458< 0.001*-0.578< 0.001*
DBP0.552< 0.001*-0.604< 0.001*
BMI0.415< 0.001*-0.483< 0.001*
HbA1C0.614< 0.001*-0.651< 0.001*

 

Table 7. Abnormal FMD Response and Increased Carotid IMT in Various Subsets
 
Abnormal FMD responseIncreased Carotid IMT
n%n%
Diabetes mellitus2087%939%
Hypertension2069%931%
Dyslipidemia1774%1044%
Smoking375%125%
Obesity1565%939%
Metabolic syndrome1286%750%
Physical inactivity233%117%
Family h/o premature CAD778%222%
Normal CAG1071%536%