Cardiology Research, ISSN 1923-2829 print, 1923-2837 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Cardiol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.cardiologyres.org

Original Article

Volume 10, Number 6, December 2019, pages 331-335


Expedited Removal of a Radial Hemostatic Compression Device Following Cardiac Catheterization Is Safe and Associated With Reduced Time to Discharge

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Compression device removal protocol times. This bar graph shows the compression, weaning, and post-removal observation times for patients in our study protocol in each of the three groups studied.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Bleeding and hematoma events grouped by weaning phase. As described in the methods section, hemostatic compression devices (HCDs) were removed with three serial deflations of one-third of the volume of air in the HCD cushion, 15 min apart, constituting phase 1 - 3 of the weaning protocol. Bleeding or hematoma could be noted during each of these phases, once the HCD was physically removed, or after the HCD was removed but before the patient was discharged.
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Time to discharge from HCD application. These cumulative frequency distributions illustrate how much time elapsed between hemostatic compression device (HCD) application and discharge for each of the three groups evaluated. Patients in the 1-h and 0.5-h weaning groups were discharged sooner than in the 2-h weaning group (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively, by Wilcoxon test). There was no significant difference between the 1-h and 0.5-h groups (P = NS by Wilcoxon test.) NS: not significant.

Tables

Table 1. Baseline Characteristicsa
 
CharacteristicAll groups2-h wean1-h wean0.5-h wean
PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; ACT: activated clotting time (in seconds). aThere were no statistically significant differences among the variables listed across groups as assessed by analysis of variance and t-tests for all possible individual comparisons for the continuous variables and for Fisher’s exact test for the categorical variables. bIn cases where heparin was not used, either bivalirudin or no anticoagulation was used.
N35499132123
Age (mean)67676766
Gender (% male)65%64%64%66%
Procedure type
  Coronary angiography81%80%80%85%
  PCI17%20%18%13%
  Other2%0%2%2%
Heparin useb96%96%98%94%
ACT performed23%21%21%25%
ACT (mean)247260246238

 

Table 2. Outcomes by Group
 
OutcomeAll groups2-h wean1-h wean0.5-h weanP valuea
Serious complications were defined as a composite of severe discomfort, severe hematoma, need for blood transfusion, surgical consultation, or unplanned admission. Times are listed as median values with the interquartile range in brackets. aCalculated using Fisher’s exact test for dichotomous variables and the Kruskal-Wallis test for time-to-event variables for all three groups. HCD: hemostatic compression device; NS: not significant.
Serious complications0000-
Any bleeding, n, (%)49 (14%)8 (8%)26 (19%)15 (12%)P = 0.032
Any hematoma, n, (%)18 (5%)3 (3%)7 (5%)8 (7%)P = NS
Bleeding or hematoma, n, (%)58 (16%)11 (11%)27 (20%)20 (16%)P = NS
Time to HCD removal (h)2.1 (2.8 - 1.8)2.9 (3.2 - 2.8)2 (2.3 - 1.8)1.6 (1.8 - 1.4)P < 0.001
Time to discharge (h)3.2 (4 - 2.7)3.5 (4.3 - 3.2)3.0 (3.7 - 2.5)3.0 (3.9 - 2.5)P < 0.001

 

Table 3. Rates of Bleeding/Hematoma Stratified by Procedure Type
 
EventDiagnostic angiogram onlyPercutaneous coronary interventionOtherP valuea
NS: not significant. aCalculated using Fisher’s exact test.
Any bleeding, n, (%)38 (13%)10 (8.5%)1 (17%)P = NS
Any hematoma, n, (%)13 (4.5%)5 (8.5%)0 (0%)P = NS
Any bleeding or hematoma, n, (%)45 (15.5%)12 (19.7%)1 (16.7%)P = NS
Total patients289596-