Cardiol Res
Cardiology Research, ISSN 1923-2829 print, 1923-2837 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Cardiol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.cardiologyres.org

Case Report

Volume 2, Number 1, February 2011, pages 48-49


Right Ventricle Failure in Sepsis: A Case Report

Umashankar Lakshmanadossa, c, Bryana M Levitanb, David H Hsib

aDivision of Hospital Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
bDivision of Cardiology, Unity Health System, Rochester, NY, USA
cCorresponding author: Umashankar Lakshmanadoss, MFL West 6th Floor, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

Manuscript accepted for publication February 21, 2011
Short title: Right Ventricle Failure in Sepsis
doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/cr12w

Abstract▴Top 

Sepsis could produce myocardial depression and typically it affects the left ventricle (LV). Sepsis could also affect right ventricle (RV), in addition to the interdependence with LV. RV pressure may be elevated secondary to pulmonary vasoconstriction, leading to RV dysfunction. Unlike LV, RV is poorly prepared to compensate for acute overload. Aggressive volume replacement may be vital to maintain RV function, but excess hydration can cause RV dilation, decreased LV diastolic filling, and reduced cardiac output. In patients having signs of inadequate cardiac output even after initial volume resuscitation, RV function should be assessed with echocardiogram. If RV dysfunction is noted, then fluid therapy should be guided by CVP measurements. If cardiac output increases with increasing CVP, maintaining higher filling pressures on the right side is indicated. On the other hand, increasing CVP with worsening of the cardiac output could worsen the RV dysfunction. In addition to the fluid management, treatment of other reversible causes like acidosis and hypoxia is also a key.

Keywords: Sepsis; RV dysfunction; Pulmonary hypertension; Central venous pressure; Fluid therapy

Introduction▴Top 

There is growing evidence that sepsis-associated cardiac dysfunction is not limited to the Left Ventricle (LV) but often involves the Right Ventricle (RV) as well. Normally, the RV has little trouble keeping up with the LV; however, in the presence of decreased contractility, increased afterload, or insufficient filling, which are three conditions commonly associated with sepsis, RV output may be unable to keep pace with increased LV output. Persistent RV dysfunction in sepsis has been associated with worse outcome. We report a case of systemic sepsis induced right ventricular (RV) failure, pulmonary hypertension and eventual improvement.

Case Report▴Top 

Fifty-one-year-old Caucasian female was admitted to our hospital with complaints of fever and chills for three days and low back pain for two days. Past medical history included recent spinal abscess followed by implantation of spinal nerve stimulator, mitral valve prolapse and GERD. Her medications included omeprazole and acetaminophen as needed for chronic back pain. On physical examination, patient appeared sick. Vital signs: BP 80/50 mmHg, Pulse 120/min, respiratory rate 24/min. No skin lesions; neck was supple. Jugular veins were distended up to angle of the ear with prominent ‘a’ and ‘v’ waves. Her P2 was loud; No murmurs or gallop; lung fields were clear with normal vesicular breath sounds. Abdomen was soft and non tender. She had increased warmth and tenderness at the level of D10 - D12 vertebrae. Neurological examination was normal. Her labs revealed WBC count of 15,000 with bandaemia of 20%, lactic acid of 45 mgs%. Her EKG revealed sinus tachycardia. Serial troponin levels were normal. She was treated with broad spectrum antibiotics, intravenous fluids and dopamine as infusion. Her blood culture was positive for Staphylococcus aureus. Her echocardiogram revealed small left ventricle with ejection fraction of 65%, flattened interventricular septum, normal left atrium (LA), bowing of the interatrial septum to the LA, right atrial (RA) and RV enlargement with severe hypokinesia of RV (Fig. 1). Estimated RV systolic pressure was 75 mmHg. She also had TEE to look for any vegetation. There was no vegetation. Her echo examination 8 months ago was normal. High resolution Chest computerized tomography (CT) revealed normal lungs and CT angiogram revealed no evidence of pulmonary embolism. The patient underwent left and right heart catheterization10 days later. Coronary arteries and LV function were normal. RA pressure 6 mmHg, RV, 36/11 mmHg, pulmonary artery 36/11 mmHg, mean 24 mmHg, indicating significant improvement of pulmonary hypertension. Echo on the next day revealed markedly improved RA and RV dilatation (Fig. 1). Patient had a full recovery on discharge.

Figure 1.
Click for large image
Figure 1. Echocardiogram in apical four chamber view. Left: Severe RV and RA dilatation. Right: Mild RV and RA dilatation in recovery.
Discussion▴Top 

Early circulatory response to sepsis and septic shock is characterized by vasodilation and increased vascular permeability, which leads to a marked reduction in intravascular filling pressures. As a result, LV ejection fraction (LVEF) often decreases during sepsis [1]. Unlike the systemic circulation, resistance in the pulmonary vasculature is often increased in sepsis, especially in the presence of acute lung injury [2]. Acute lung injury leads to hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, and this pulmonary pressor response is enhanced by hypercarbia or acidosis. Decreased production of nitric oxide, an endogenous vasodilator, likely contributes to increased PVR and pulmonary hypertension in sepsis [3]. Coagulation abnormalities are also common in the pulmonary vascular bed during sepsis and acute lung injury and may lead to pulmonary arterial thrombosis that further raises PVR. The RV is poorly prepared to compensate for acute elevations in afterload. Aggressive fluid resuscitation and frequent CVP monitoring are often necessary to ensure adequate right-sided filling pressures. Although volume expansion should be the initial treatment for RV dysfunction in septic shock, a threshold exists beyond which further fluid resuscitation is detrimental. The presence of peripheral edema or jugular venous distension may indicate elevated right-sided pressures but may not necessarily indicate RV failure or even adequate RV filling. A prudent approach is to assess RV function in patients who continue to show signs of inadequate cardiac output after initial volume resuscitation [4]. If echocardiography reveals decreased RV contractility, fluid therapy should be guided based on the CVP measurement. Increases in CVP, without increase in cardiac output, may impede LV filling which could in turn worsen the RV dysfunction. On the other hand, if cardiac output increases with further elevation of CVP, maintenance of higher right-sided filling pressures may be warranted. Nitric oxide improves PVR and decreases RV afterload and may be useful therapy in bridging patients with acute RV failure in septic shock [5].

Conclusion

Right ventricular dysfunction is common in sepsis and septic shock because of decreased myocardial contractility and elevated PVR despite a concomitant decrease in systemic vascular resistance. Aggressive volume replacement may be vital in maintaining RV function, but excess hydration can cause RV dilation, decreased LV diastolic filling, and reduced cardiac output. The mainstay of treatment for acute right heart dysfunction in the setting of sepsis should concentrate on fluid repletion, monitoring for signs of RV overload, and correcting reversible causes of elevated PVR, such as hypoxia, acidosis, and lung hyperinflation.

Financial Disclosures

None

Conflicts of Interest

None


References▴Top 
  1. Kumar A, Haery C, Parrillo JE. Myocardial dysfunction in septic shock. Crit Care Clin. 2000;16(2):251-287.
    pubmed doi
  2. Hill NS, Klinger JR. Pulmonary hypertension in the intensive care unit: Critical role of the right ventricle. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(9):2210-2211.
    pubmed doi
  3. Redl G, Germann P, Plattner H, Hammerle A. Right ventricular function in early septic shock states. Intensive Care Med. 1993;19(1):3-7.
    pubmed doi
  4. Chan CM, Klinger JR. The right ventricle in sepsis. Clin Chest Med. 2008;29(4):661-676, ix.
    pubmed
  5. Offner PJ, Ogura H, Jordan BS, Pruitt BA Jr, Cioffi WG. Effects of inhaled nitric oxide on right ventricular function in endotoxin shock. J Trauma. 1995;39(2):179-185, discussion 185-186.
    pubmed


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Cardiology Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Cardiology Research, bimonthly, ISSN 1923-2829 (print), 1923-2837 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.

This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.cardiologyres.org   editorial contact: editor@cardiologyres.org    elmer.editorial2@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.