Cardiol Res
Cardiology Research, ISSN 1923-2829 print, 1923-2837 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Cardiol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.cardiologyres.org

Original Article

Volume 2, Number 1, February 2011, pages 16-26


Mitral Annular Systolic Velocities Predict Left Ventricular Wall Motion Abnormality During Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography

Dawod Sharifa, b, c, Amal Sharif-Rasslanb, Camilia Shahlaa

aDepartment of Cardiology, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
bTechnion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
cCorresponding author: Dawod Sharif, Department of Cardiology, Bnai Zion Medical Center, 47 Golomb St, Haifa, Israel

Manuscript accepted for publication February 21, 2011
Short title: Mitral Annular Systolic Velocities in Stress Echo
doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/cr14w

Abstract▴Top 

Background: Longitudinal systolic left ventricular contraction is complementary to the radial performance and can be assessed using tissue Doppler imaging (TDI). This study was performed to evaluate the contribution of mitral annular systolic velocities using TDI after dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE).

Methods and Results: Fifty subjects with suspected coronary artery disease and chest pain were examined, using DSE as usual, as well as TDI imaging of the mitral annulus at the septal, lateral, inferior, anterior, posterior regions and the proximal anteroseptal region from the apical views, before and immediately after DSE. In 24 subjects the study was normal, while wall motion abnormality was seen in 26, 9 of them only after DSE. Mitral annular systolic velocity at the 6 locations increased significantly after DSE both in normal subjects and in those with wall motion abnormality (WMA). After DSE mitral annular septal systolic velocity in normals, 19.2 ± 3.8 cm/sec, was higher than in those with WMA, 14.6 ± 2.5 cm/sec, P < 0.0003. Post-DSE mitral systolic velocity was senstive and accurate in predicting WMA.

Conclusions: Systolic mitral TDI velocities increase after DSE, however to a lesser extent in those with wall motion abnormality, and can differentiate them from normal subjects.

Keywords: Stress echocardiogrpahy; Dobutamine; Tissue Doppler imaging; Ischemia; Coronary artery disease

Introduction▴Top 

Dobutamine stress echocardiography is an established method for the assessment of coronary artery disease with a sensitivity and specificity of 80% - 85% [1, 2], comparable to those of radio-isotopic myocardial perfusion studies. The major limitations of dobutamine stress echocardiography are lack of suitable acoustic window [3], suboptimal delineation of the endocardial border necessitating harmonic and contrast imaging [4-7], the subjective nature of analysis and the lack of uniform diagnostic criteria requiring high level of expertise in wall motion analysis [8-11].

The most important diagnostic element in dobutamine stress echocardiography is segmental systolic performance in the radial direction. However, abnormalities of longitudinal systolic performance may precede radial abnormalities and thus their evaluation may enhance the sensitivity of detection of contractile abnormalities [12, 13]. Tissue Doppler imaging has been shown to correlate with segmental myocardial wall motion [14-16].

Sampling at the mitral valve annulus, tissue Doppler imaging may reflect longitudinal systolic performance of the left ventricle.

The purpose of this study was to correlate immediate post dobutamine stress echocardiography regional mitral annular tissue Doppler imaging indices with regional left ventricular wall motion abnormalities during dobutamine stress echocardiography and their contribution to diagnsois.

Methods▴Top 

Population

Fifty patients, 29 women, age 60.3 ± 13.4 years, were prospectively evaluated for the presence of coronary artery disease. All had transthoracic echocardiography before dobutamine stress echocardiography. Coronary angiography was performed according to clinical indications taking into consideration the dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) results.

Dobutamine stress echocardiography

The protocol of dobutamine infusion consisted of 3 minute stages for each dose, staring with 5 µg/kg/min and increasing to 10, 20, 30 and 40 µg/kg/min. If end-points did not occur or 85% of the age adjusted heart rate was not achieved, 0.25 mg atropine was injected every 2 minutes up to 1 mg or until the target heart rate was achieved. Blood pressure and 12 lead electrocardiograms were recorded at rest and throughout the dobutamine stress echocardiography study. Horizontal or down-sloping > 1 mm ST-segment depression at 0.06 sec after the J point was considered as evidence for myocardial ischemia.

Image acquisition

Images were obtained while the patients in the left lateral decubitus position. A standard commercial Hewlett Packard Sonos 5500 echocardiographic machine equipped with S4 transducer and second harmonic imaging as well as color-kinesis was used. Parasternal long axis and short axis as well as apical 4-chamber and 2-chamber views were recorded at rest, low dose dobutamine infusion, peak exercise and in the recovery period. Digital images were stored on magneto-optic discs for later off-line analysis. In addition super VHS videotape recordings were performed throughout the studies.

Dobutamine stress echocardiographic analysis

Segmental left ventricular wall motion analysis was performed using 16-segment model [17]. Regional wall motion was estimated as normal, hypokinetic, akinetic or dyskinetic. Analysis of the gray-scale two-dimensional image as well as the color-kinesis overlay was combined in the assessment of regional left ventricular wall motion. New or worsening segmental wall motion was considered as ischemic response. Ischemic response (I) was identified when wall motion decreased by at least 1 grade in 2 adjacent segments or wall motion decreased by at least 2 grades in 1 segment, otherwise no ischemia, or normal response (N) was diagnosed.

Tissue Doppler imaging

The apical 4 chamber, 2 chamber and 3 chamber views were used to assess the longitudinal velocities of the mitral annulus. The sample volume of the pulsed wave Doppler was located at the mitral annulus and recording was performed from the septal, lateral, anterior, inferior and posterior portions of the annulus. In addition Doppler sampling from the proximal anteroseptal segment was performed. Annular Doppler velocities were recorded on videotape for off-line analysis. Resting annular longitudinal velocities (S0), and immadiate post- dobutamine stress echocardiography peak systolic velocities (S1) were measured, and their difference (dS), dS/S0 and ratio (S1/S0) were calculated.

Statistical analysis

Mean values and standard deviation of the 6 annular mitral longitudinal velocities, S0, S1, dS, dS/S0 and S1/S0 were calculated for all. Student t-test assuming unequal variances, was performed; P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results▴Top 

All subjects underwent DSE studies safely and uneventfully. Heart rate increased from 62.4 ± 9.9 bpm to 123 ± 14.4 bpm. Systolic blood pressure increased from 138 ± 7 mmHg to 162 ± 9 mmHg.

Left ventricular wall motion abnormalities

In 24 patients the dobutamine stress echocardiography results were considered normal (N), without baseline or dobutamine induced wall motion abnormalities. In 26 left ventricular wall motion abnormalities were observed (Pt), in 9 only after dobutamine infusion (Pt1), while resting wall motion abnormalities were observed in 17, with apical involvement in 5, antrior-septal in 2, inferior in 13, posterior in 4 and lateral in 1. In patients with resting wall motion abnormalities, in 2 (Pt2) wall motion improved after dobutamine stress echocardiography, in 3 (Pt3) wall motion did not change after dobutamine stress echocardiography, and in 12 (Pt4) worsened after dobutamine stress echocardiography (Table 1).

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Left Ventricular Wall Motion Score Index at Rest and After Stress Echocardiography in Subgroups of Wall Motion Abnormality
 

Mitral annular systolic velocities at rest

Generally, velocities were similar in normal subjects and in those with wall motion abnormality (WMA), except for slightly higher inferior and posterior mitral annular velocities in normal subjects (about 1 cm/sec higher) which, however, reached statistical significance (Table 2).

Table 2.
Click to view
Table 2. Mitral Annular Systolic Velocities at Rest and After Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in All Subjects
 

Systolic mitral annular velocities after dobutamine stress echocardiography

After dobutamine stress echocardiography, mitral annular systolic velocities increased significantly in normal subjects and those with WMA, in all 6 regions of Doppler sampling (Table 2). However, only septal peak annular velocities after dobutamine stress echocardiography (Septal-S1) were significantly higher in normal subjects (Table 2).

Calculated parameters of systolic mitral velocities

Post-dobutamine stress echocardiography and baseline velocity difference (dS = S1 - S0), and ratio (S1/S0) as well as dS/S1 were significantly higher in normal subjects compared to those with wall motion abnormalities (Table 3).

Table 3.
Click to view
Table 3. Mitral Annular Systolic Velocity Calculated Parameters at Rest and After Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in All Subjects
 

Relation of mitral annular systolic velocities to different groups of timing of wall motion abnormality

As shown in Table 4 systolic mitral annular velocities were normal at rest in all subgroups with wall motion abnormality. After DSE mitral annular systolic velocities were lower than normal in all subjects with WMA, except those without change in wall motion (Pt3). Combining the 21 subjects with ischemic response (Pt1 and Pt4) revealed that sytolic septal annular velocities were lower than normal after DSE.

Table 4.
Click to view
Table 4. Mitral Annular Systolic Velocities at Rest and After Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in Different Subgroups of Change in Wall Motion Abnormality
 

Relation of mitral annular systolic velocities to different groups of location of wall motion abnormality

Systolic mitral septal annular velocities at rest in subejcts with wall motion abnormality at different locations were similar to normal. After DSE mitral annular septal systolic velocities were less than normal in all the groups with wall motion abnormalities at all locations (Table 5).

Table 5.
Click to view
Table 5. Mitral Annular Systolic Velocities at Rest and After Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography According to Location of Wall Motion Abnormality Compared to Normal
 

Relation to wall motion score index

In subjects with wall motion abnormalities, an inverse relationship between baseline septal systolic velocity S0 and post-dobutamine stress echocardiography velocity S1 on one hand and wall motion score index on the other was observed (Fig. 1). Septal velocity began to decrease when wall motion score index exceeded 1.25. The same inverse relationship was obsereved in ptaients who developed wall motion abnormalities only after dobutamine stress echocardiography (Pt1), in those with baseline wall motion abnormalities which did not change during dobutamine stress echocardiography (Pt3), and in those with resting wall motion abnormalities which worsened during dobutamine stress echocardiography (Pt 4). In all these patient subgroups, systolic septal annular velocities decreased when wall motion score index exceeded 1.25. Subjects with ischemic response (Pt1 and Pt4 combined together) showed the same finding. Moreover, the increase in septal velocity after dobutamine stress echocardiography (dS), as well as (dS/S0) decreased when the difference in wall motion score index (WMSI) after dobutamine stress echocardiography was larger (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.
Click for large image
Figure 1. Mitral annular systolic velocity relationship with left ventricular wall motion score index at rest (left) and after dobutamine stress (right), in different groups of patients as depicted in each figure. S0: Systolic velocity at rest (cm/sec), S1: Systolic velocity after DSE (cm/sec), WMSI0: Wall motion score index at rest, WMSI1: Wall motion score index after DSE.

Diagnostic value of systolic septal annular velocities

Baseline septal velocities (S0) did not differentiate between normal subjects and those with wall motion abnormalities (Fig. 2). However, post-dobutamine stress echocardiography septal velocities (S1), as well as velocity differnece (dS), (dS/S0) and (S1/S0) effectively differntiated normal subjects from those with wall motion abnormalities, with narrow band of overlap, as seen in Figure 2. Cutoff values with high sensitivty, specificity and diagnostic accuracy in detecting patients with wall motion abnormalities were achieved with S1 < 17 cm/sec, S1/S0 < 1.5, dS < 6 cm/sec and dS/S0 < 0.55 (Table 6).

Figure 2.
Click for large image
Figure 2. Scattergrams of mitral annular systolic velocities in normal subjects (rhomboids) and in patients with left ventricular wall motion abnormality (squares) at rest and after stress.

Table 6.
Click to view
Table 6. Diagnostic Value of Mitral Annular Systolic Velocity Parameters for the Detection of Wall Motion Abnormality
 

Relationship of region of wall motion abnormality and systolic septal velocity

Septal velocities after dobutamine stress echocardiography lower than normal were observed when the wall motion abnormalities involved the left ventricular apex, anteroseptal, lateral and inferior segments (Table 5).

Only in those with anterior wall motion abnormalities no differnece was obeserved most probably due to small number of subjects.

Relation to coronary angiography

Coronary angiography was not performed in subjects without wall motion abnormality and without ischemic response. In 12 subjects with wall motion abnormality coronary angiography was performed and stenotic lesion locations correlated with sites of regional wall motion abnormality.

Discussion▴Top 

The aim of the present was to examine the utility of longitudinal left ventricular systolic function from mitral annular tissue Doppler velocities in evaluation of dobutamine stress echocardiographic studies. It was found that mitral annular systolic velocities increased after dobutamine stress echocardiography in those with or without left ventricular wall motion abnormalities. In subjects with left ventricular wall motion abnormalities, the increase in septal annular systolic velocities after dobutamine stress was blunted. Systolic mitral annular velocity less than 17 cm/sec was sensitive, specific and accurate in predicting presence of wall motion abnormalities. Other calculated indices relating post-dobutamine stress echocardiography systolic mitral annular velocity to baseline values exhibited similar behavior.

Myocardial ischemia results in alteration of diastolic and systolic left ventricular function. The sequence of regional changes in myocardial function induced by acute ischemia was defined by experimental sonomicrometric techniques [18, 19]. Accordingly, detection of the presence of myocardial ischemia includes delay in onset of myocardial thickening, decrease in the rate and degree of thickening, late systolic thinning followed by delay in peak thickening and post-systolic thickening. The findings of this study relate to differences in the changes in the rate of longitudinal left ventricular systolic function represented by peak mitral annular systolic velocity.

Despite the widespread use of dobutamine stress echocardiography, evaluation of wall motion is still mostly visual and subjective resulting in inter-observer variability [8-11]. Optimal technique of evaluation should not only quantify the parameters of regional myocardial ischemia, velocities, amplitude and timing of motion but also should be simple in order to gain widespread application.

Several imaging methods have been introduced to make analysis of stress echocardiography more quantitative and less subjective [20-23]. However some of these may lack simplicity and cannot be applied by many commercially available echocardigraphic machines. In this study, simple numerical parameter-mitral annular systolic velocity, could predict presence of wall motion abnormalities making evaluation of stress echocardiographic studies more objective, although predicting localization of wall motion abnormalities was not effective. Mitral annular systolic velocity emerged as a parameter of global ischemia not related to the region of ischemia.

Tissue Doppler imaging methods have been applied for the detection of myocardial ischemia [24-24]. In normal subjects the segmental response to increase in dobuatmine infusion is a gradual and continuous increase in myocardial velocities, strain rate and strain [15, 27-29]. Consistent with our study it was reported that abnormal increase in segmental velocity during stress indicates ischemia [30, 31].

Mitral annular systolic velocity at the site insertion of the anterior mitral leaflet with the inter-ventricular septum was the most valuable region of evaluation of tissue Doppler velocities resulting in significant differences in velocities after stress between subjects with and those without left ventricular wall motion abnormality. When left ventricular wall motion score index was equal or greater than 1.25, septal mitral annular Doppler velocity was reduced as a marker of global left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Strengths and limitations

The strength of this study is that a simple evaluation of mitral annular tissue Doppler velocity after dobutamine stress echocardiography and related calculated were accurate in predicting left ventricular wall motion abnormality. However these parameters were not related to the site of wall motion abnormality, and instead they were related to global systolic function and dysfunction like increase in left ventricular wall motion score index more than 1.25. Another limitation was that coronary angiography was not performed in all subjects, therefore correlation with this hard gold standard was not possible.

Conclusion

Systolic mitral TDI velocities increase after DSE, however to a lesser extent in those with wall motion abnormality, and can differentiate them from normal subjects. Application of TDI mitral velocities may simplify and aid in interpreting dobutamine stress echo studies.

Disclosure

None

Conflict of Interest

None


References▴Top 
  1. Geleijnse ML, Fioretti PM, Roelandt JR. Methodology, feasibility, safety and diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30(3):595-606.
    pubmed doi
  2. Picano E. Stress echocardiography: a historical perspective. Am J Med. 2003;114(2):126-130.
    pubmed doi
  3. Kasprzak JD, Paelinck B, Ten Cate FJ, Vletter WB, de Jong N, Poldermans D, Elhendy A, et al. Comparison of native and contrast-enhanced harmonic echocardiography for visualization of left ventricular endocardial border. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83(2):211-217.
    pubmed doi
  4. Spencer KT, Bednarz J, Rafter PG, Korcarz C, Lang RM. Use of harmonic imaging without echocardiographic contrast to improve two-dimensional image quality. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82(6):794-799.
    pubmed doi
  5. Al-Mansour HA, Mulvagh SL, Pumper GM, Klarich KW, Foley DA. Usefulness of harmonic imaging for left ventricular opacification and endocardial border delineation by optison. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:795-799, A710.
    pubmed
  6. Cohen JL, Cheirif J, Segar DS, Gillam LD, Gottdiener JS, Hausnerova E, Bruns DE. Improved left ventricular endocardial border delineation and opacification with OPTISON (FS069), a new echocardiographic contrast agent. Results of a phase III Multicenter Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32(3):746-752.
    pubmed doi
  7. Finkelhor RS, Pajouh M, Kett A, Stefanski R, Bosich G, Youssefi ME, Bahler RC. Clinical impact of second harmonic imaging and left heart contrast in echocardiographic stress testing. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85(6):740-743.
    pubmed doi
  8. Picano E, Lattanzi F, Orlandini A, Marini C, L'Abbate A. Stress echocardiography and the human factor: the importance of being expert. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17(3):666-669.
    pubmed doi
  9. Hoffmann R, Lethen H, Marwick T, Arnese M, Fioretti P, Pingitore A, Picano E, et al. Analysis of interinstitutional observer agreement in interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27(2):330-336.
    pubmed doi
  10. Kvitting JP, Wigstrom L, Strotmann JM, Sutherland GR. How accurate is visual assessment of synchronicity in myocardial motion? An In vitro study with computer-simulated regional delay in myocardial motion: clinical implications for rest and stress echocardiography studies. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999;12(9):698-705.
    pubmed doi
  11. Hoffmann R, Marwick TH, Poldermans D, Lethen H, Ciani R, van der Meer P, Tries HP, et al. Refinements in stress echocardiographic techniques improve inter-institutional agreement in interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiograms. Eur Heart J. 2002;23(10):821-829.
    pubmed doi
  12. Ballo P, Quatrini I, Giacomin E, Motto A, Mondillo S. Circumferential versus longitudinal systolic function in patients with hypertension: a nonlinear relation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(3):298-306.
    pubmed doi
  13. Maciver DH, Townsend M. A novel mechanism of heart failure with normal ejection fraction. Heart. 2008;94(4):446-449.
    pubmed doi
  14. Yamada E, Garcia M, Thomas JD, Marwick TH. Myocardial Doppler velocity imaging—a quantitative technique for interpretation of dobutamine echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82(6):806-809, A809-810.
    pubmed
  15. Wilkenshoff UM, Sovany A, Wigstrom L, Olstad B, Lindstrom L, Engvall J, Janerot-Sjoberg B, et al. Regional mean systolic myocardial velocity estimation by real-time color Doppler myocardial imaging: a new technique for quantifying regional systolic function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998;11(7):683-692.
    pubmed doi
  16. Pasquet A, Armstrong G, Beachler L, Lauer MS, Marwick TH. Use of segmental tissue Doppler velocity to quantitate exercise echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999;12(11):901-912.
    pubmed doi
  17. Armstrong WF, Pellikka PA, Ryan T, Crouse L, Zoghbi WA. Stress echocardiography: recommendations for performance and interpretation of stress echocardiography. Stress Echocardiography Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998;11(1):97-104.
    pubmed doi
  18. Theroux P, Ross J Jr, Franklin D, Kemper WS, Sasyama S. Regional Myocardial function in the conscious dog during acute coronary occlusion and responses to morphine, propranolol, nitroglycerin, and lidocaine. Circulation. 1976;53(2):302-314.
    pubmed
  19. Ehring T, Heusch G. Left ventricular asynchrony: an indicator of regional myocardial dysfunction. Am Heart J. 1990;120(5):1047-1057.
    pubmed doi
  20. Perez JE, Waggoner AD, Davila-Roman VG, Cardona H, Miller JG. On-line quantification of ventricular function during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Eur Heart J. 1992;13(12):1669-1676.
    pubmed
  21. Gorcsan J 3rd, Strum DP, Mandarino WA, Gulati VK, Pinsky MR. Quantitative assessment of alterations in regional left ventricular contractility with color-coded tissue Doppler echocardiography. Comparison with sonomicrometry and pressure-volume relations. Circulation. 1997;95(10):2423-2433.
    pubmed
  22. Koch R, Lang RM, Garcia MJ, Weinert L, Bednarz J, Korcarz C, Coughlan B, et al. Objective evaluation of regional left ventricular wall motion during dobutamine stress echocardiographic studies using segmental analysis of color kinesis images. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34(2):409-419.
    pubmed doi
  23. Hanekom L, Cho GY, Leano R, Jeffriess L, Marwick TH. Comparison of two-dimensional speckle and tissue Doppler strain measurement during dobutamine stress echocardiography: an angiographic correlation. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(14):1765-1772.
    pubmed doi
  24. Derumeaux G, Ovize M, Loufoua J, Andre-Fouet X, Minaire Y, Cribier A, Letac B. Doppler tissue imaging quantitates regional wall motion during myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Circulation. 1998;97(19):1970-1977.
    pubmed
  25. Bach DS, Armstrong WF, Donovan CL, Muller DW. Quantitative Doppler tissue imaging for assessment of regional myocardial velocities during transient ischemia and reperfusion. Am Heart J. 1996;132(4):721-725.
    pubmed doi
  26. Derumeaux G, Ovize M, Loufoua J, Pontier G, Andre-Fouet X, Cribier A. Assessment of nonuniformity of transmural myocardial velocities by color-coded tissue Doppler imaging: characterization of normal, ischemic, and stunned myocardium. Circulation. 2000;101(12):1390-1395.
    pubmed
  27. Gorcsan J 3rd, Deswal A, Mankad S, Mandarino WA, Mahler CM, Yamazaki N, Katz WE. Quantification of the myocardial response to low-dose dobutamine using tissue Doppler echocardiographic measures of velocity and velocity gradient. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81(5):615-623.
    pubmed doi
  28. Urheim S, Edvardsen T, Torp H, Angelsen B, Smiseth OA. Myocardial strain by Doppler echocardiography. Validation of a new method to quantify regional myocardial function. Circulation. 2000;102(10):1158-1164.
    pubmed
  29. Weidemann F, Jamal F, Kowalski M, Kukulski T, D’Hooge J, Bijnens B, Hatle L, et al. Can strain rate and strain quantify changes in regional systolic function during dobutamine infusion, B-blockade, and atrial pacing—implications for quantitative stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15(5):416-424.
    pubmed doi
  30. Armstrong G, Pasquet A, Fukamachi K, Cardon L, Olstad B, Marwick T. Use of peak systolic strain as an index of regional left ventricular function: comparison with tissue Doppler velocity during dobutamine stress and myocardial ischemia. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000;13(8):731-737.
    pubmed doi
  31. Pasquet A, Armstrong G, Rimmerman C, Marwick TH. Correlation of myocardial Doppler velocity response to exercise with independent evidence of myocardial ischemia by dual-isotope single-photon emission computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85(5):536-542.
    pubmed doi


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Cardiology Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Cardiology Research, bimonthly, ISSN 1923-2829 (print), 1923-2837 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.

This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.cardiologyres.org   editorial contact: editor@cardiologyres.org    elmer.editorial2@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.