Cardiol Res
Cardiology Research, ISSN 1923-2829 print, 1923-2837 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Cardiol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.cardiologyres.org

Short Communication

Volume 14, Number 3, June 2023, pages 237-239


Baseline Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Pre-Treatment Cancer Compared With Non-Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score Analysis

Lolita Golemia, Akash Sharmab, Alexandra Sarauc, Rajiv Varandanid, Christopher W. Sedere, Tochi M. Okwuosac, f

aDepartment of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
bDepartment of Internal Medicine, University at Buffalo (Catholic Health System - Sister of Charity Hospital), Buffalo, NY, USA
cDivision of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
dDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA
eDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
fCorresponding Author: Tochi M. Okwuosa, Division of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA

Manuscript submitted January 9, 2023, accepted February 6, 2023, published online April 18, 2023
Short title: EKG Abnormalities in Cancer Patients
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/cr1466

Abstract▴Top 

Background: Most studies have compared post-treatment electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities in cancer patients to the general population. To assess baseline cardiovascular (CV) risk, we compared pre-treatment ECG abnormalities in cancer patients with a non-cancer surgical population.

Methods: We conducted a combined prospective (n = 30) and retrospective (n = 229) cohort study of patients aged 18 - 80 years with diagnosis of hematologic or solid malignancy, compared with 267 pre-surgical, non-cancer, age- and sex-matched controls. Computerized ECG interpretations were obtained, and one-third of the ECGs underwent blinded interpretation by a board-certified cardiologist (agreement r = 0.94). We performed contingency table analyses using likelihood ratio Chi-square statistics, with calculated odds ratios. Data were analyzed after propensity score matching.

Results: The mean age of cases was 60.97 ± 13.86; and 59.44 ± 11.83 years for controls. Pre-treatment cancer patients had higher likelihood of abnormal ECG (odds ratio (OR): 1.55; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05 to 2.30), and more ECG abnormalities (χ2 = 4.0502; P = 0.04) compared with non-cancer patients. ECG abnormalities were higher in black compared to non-black patients (P = 0.001). In addition, baseline ECGs among cancer patients prior to cancer therapy demonstrated less QT prolongation and intra-ventricular conduction defect (P = 0.04); but showed more arrhythmias (P < 0.01) and atrial fibrillation (AF) (P = 0.01) compared with the general patient population.

Conclusions: Based on these findings, we recommend that all cancer patients receive an ECG, a low-cost and widely available tool, as part of their CV baseline screening, prior to cancer treatment.

Keywords: Arrhythmia; Electrocardiography; Guidelines; Screening; Cancer patients

Introduction▴Top 

The cardiotoxic effects of cancer treatments contribute to approximately 5 million emergency visits annually in the United States. As such, much attention needs to be paid to pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD), which may be undiagnosed prior to cancer therapy. In most trials, limited cardiac screening before cancer therapy makes it difficult to assess pre-existing, undiagnosed CVD; as a result, subsequent CVD manifestations are sometimes improperly attributed to cancer therapy. In this cohort with a diverse racial makeup, we aimed to explore pre-treatment electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities as a marker of baseline CVD among patients prior to cancer treatment compared with non-cancer patients.

Materials and Methods▴Top 

We performed a prospective (n = 30) and retrospective (n = 229) cohort study on patients aged 18 - 80 years old, with hematologic or solid malignancy. The control group comprised 267 pre-surgical, non-cancer, age- and sex-matched controls. Prospective data were obtained from a randomized selection of patients planned to receive their cancer treatment at Rush University Medical Center (RUMC) while retrospective data were obtained from 2013 - 2018 archives of RUMC Cancer Registry and a pool of pre-surgical, non-cancer patients. This study was approved by the RUMC Institutional Review Boards committee; and all prospective patients provided informed consent. This study was conducted in compliance with the ethical standards of the responsible institution on human subjects as well as with the Helsinki Declaration.

Each ECG, recorded at 25 mm/s speed and 10 mm/mV amplification, was interpreted by the integrated software, and confirmed by an experienced cardiologist per standard practice. One-third of ECGs underwent blinded interpretation by another board-certified cardiologist (agreement r = 0.94). ECG abnormalities were compared between cancer and non-cancer patients, and a summed ECG score was calculated with each abnormality tallied as 1 point (Table 1). Statistical analysis was performed using R statistical software version 3.4.3. Package Matchit was used for propensity score matching. Nearest neighborhood method was used for matching. Results were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). P value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics and Electrocardiogram Comparisons Between Cases and Controls
 
Results▴Top 

A total of 228 cases and 267 controls were included in the final analysis. The mean age for the cases cohort was 60.97 ± 13.86 years, and 59.44 ± 11.83 years for the control cohort; 243 (49%) white and 170 (34%) black. The study included 300 (61%) females; and a sum of 211 patients had abnormal ECGs: 35.2% diabetes, 72.5% hypertension, 18% CAD, 3.8% coronary artery bypass graft, 10.9% atrial fibrillation (AF), and 9% valvular issues. Nearest neighborhood propensity score matching was performed for CAD, hypertension, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity based on parameters that were significantly different between groups; 228 cases were matched with 228 controls, mean age 57.12 ± 10.91 and 60.97 ± 13.86, respectively. More abnormal ECGs were noted among the pre-treatment cancer group than the control group (OR: 1.55, 95%, CI: 1.05 - 2.30; P = 0.02) (Table 1). ECG abnormalities were higher in black compared to non-black patients (P = 0.001). In addition, baseline ECGs among cancer patients prior to cancer therapy demonstrated less QT prolongation and intra-ventricular conduction defect (P = 0.04); but showed more arrhythmias (P < 0.01) and AF (P = 0.01) compared with the general patient population.

Discussion▴Top 

We found that cancer patients referred to our cancer center had an overall 55% higher chance of ECG abnormalities, based on a summed ECG parameter score, when compared with the non-cancer population. These ECG abnormalities were two times higher among black compared with non-black patients. To our knowledge, this is the first study that has compared baseline ECG characteristics of cancer patients with non-cancer patients before chemotherapy; and with racial/ethnic implications. In a general population of patients, Movahed et al found that African Americans had 2.5 times higher baseline ECG abnormalities independent of echocardiographic abnormalities or demographics [1]; our study demonstrated similar findings.

Although cancer patients are known to have a high prevalence of arrhythmias during and post-chemotherapy, our study found that they also have higher likelihood of arrhythmias (including AF) in the pre-treatment phase. These arrhythmias can be attributed to electrolyte abnormalities, paraneoplastic syndrome, overlapping risk factors for cancer and cardiac disease, and metastasis of cardiac and autonomic nervous system in cancer patients [2, 3]. At least one electrolyte or acid-base abnormality has been demonstrated in nearly 58% of cancer patients, with hypocalcemia being most common [4].

Our study was limited by a small sample size. Even after propensity score matching, there were significant differences in certain baseline variables between cases and controls that could affect ECG outcomes in our study participants. Furthermore, not all study participants were prospectively enrolled, and this study was not a randomized controlled trial; thus, residual confounding was not accounted for at this time.

In conclusion, we found that cancer patients had more baseline ECG abnormalities, particularly arrhythmias and AF, compared with non-cancer patients. These findings of ECG abnormalities were higher among blacks in our study and could possibly be a marker of higher baseline cardiovascular risk in this population going into cancer therapy. In line with the new cardio-oncology guidelines [5], we recommend that all cancer patients receive an ECG, a low-cost and widely available tool, as part of their cardiovascular baseline screening, prior to cancer treatment. Baseline cardiac screening with ECG may help with overall cardiac outcomes, by detecting early pre-existing conditions that can result in alternative chemotherapeutic treatments and closer cardiac monitoring during cancer treatment. The peri-treatment cardiovascular prognostic implications of higher baseline ECG abnormalities among black cancer patients require further exploration. Further research could also evaluate how our study findings translate into future prediction of cardiovascular events.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Rush University’s Research Department for all the assistance they provided with the retrospective data collection.

Financial Disclosure

None to declare.

Conflict of Interest

All authors have nothing to disclose.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from the patients who participated in the prospective portion of the study. Patient information was deidentified.

Author Contributions

Lolita Golemi and Alexandra Sarau were involved in data collection and drafting and revising the manuscript. Akash Sharma assisted with analysis and data interpretation. Rajiv Varandani was involved in data collection and conception and design of the project. Christopher W. Seder gave final approval of the manuscript submitted. Tochi M. Okwuosa designed the study and was also involved in data interpretation, revision of the manuscript and final approval of the submitted manuscript.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (TO), upon request.


References▴Top 
  1. Movahed MR, Sattur S, Bates S. Higher prevalence of abnormal electrocardigrams (ECG) in African Americans undergoing screening ECG and echocardiography. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2019;18(2):86-88.
    doi pubmed
  2. Berardi R, Torniai M, Lenci E, Pecci F, Morgese F, Rinaldi S. Electrolyte disorders in cancer patients: a systematic review. Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment. 2019;5:79.
    doi
  3. Rosner MH, Dalkin AC. Electrolyte disorders associated with cancer. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2014;21(1):7-17.
    doi pubmed
  4. Li Y, Chen X, Shen Z, Wang Y, Hu J, Xu J, Shen B, et al. Electrolyte and acid-base disorders in cancer patients and its impact on clinical outcomes: evidence from a real-world study in China. Ren Fail. 2020;42(1):234-243.
    doi pubmed
  5. Lyon AR, Lopez-Fernandez T, Couch LS, Asteggiano R, Aznar MC, Bergler-Klein J, Boriani G, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardio-oncology developed in collaboration with the European Hematology Association (EHA), the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) and the International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS). Eur Heart J. 2022;43(41):4229-4361.
    doi pubmed


This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Cardiology Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Cardiology Research, bimonthly, ISSN 1923-2829 (print), 1923-2837 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.

This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.cardiologyres.org   editorial contact: editor@cardiologyres.org    elmer.editorial2@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.