Does Sinus Rhythm Restoration in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Pulmonary Vein Isolation Have Acute Hemodynamic Benefits?

Tomo Komaki, Noriyuki Mohri, Akihito Ideishi, Kohei Tashiro, Naoko Koyanagi, Shin-ichiro Miura, Masahiro Ogawa

Abstract


Background: Although the restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have long-term benefits, few studies have investigated the acute hemodynamic benefits immediately after SR restoration. Therefore, we investigated whether hemodynamic changes occurred in the first few minutes after cardioversion from AF to SR.

Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 145 patients with AF and divided them into a pre-AF group comprising patients in whom SR was restored by electrical cardioversion during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI; n = 74) and a control group comprising patients who were in SR throughout the procedure (n = 71). The pre-AF group was subdivided into subgroups according to AF classification (paroxysmal AF (PAF), persistent AF (PerAF), and long-standing persistent AF (LSPAF)) and into quartiles based on the AF-heart rate (HR). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and left atrial pressure (LAP) were measured immediately after transseptal puncture (pre-measurement) and before withdrawal from the left atrium after PVI (post-measurement). The changes in MAP and LAP between the pre- and post-measurement (MAP and LAP) were calculated by subtracting the pre-measurements (MAPpre and LAPpre) from the post-measurements (MAPpost and LAPpost).

Results: In the pre-AF group, the time from cardioversion to post-measurement was 19 16 min. When MAP and LAP were compared with the control group, MAP was significantly smaller (4.9 17.8 vs. 11.0 14.2 mm Hg, respectively; P = 0.025), and LAP was not significantly different between the groups. In the subgroup analyses, although LAP was not significantly different among AF types, MAP was significantly increased in the PAF group compared to the PerAF and LSPAF groups (24.0 18.5 vs. 3.1 16.8 and 4.5 18.1 mm Hg, respectively; P = 0.042). The HRpre in the quartiles with the lowest, second, third, and highest AF-HR were approximately 58, 74, 86, and 109 beats per minute (bpm), respectively. The LAP and MAP were not significantly different among the AF-HR quartile groups.

Conclusions: In patients with PAF, atrial contractions may resume quickly, which leads to hemodynamic improvement immediately after SR restoration. As for AF-HR, there was no significant impairment of ventricular diastolic filling at approximately < 109 bpm.




Cardiol Res. 2024;15(4):298-308
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/cr1692

Keywords


Atrial fibrillation; Cardioversion; Mean arterial pressure; Left atrial pressure; Sinus rhythm

Full Text: HTML PDF
 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Cardiology Research, bimonthly, ISSN 1923-2829 (print), 1923-2837 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.

This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.cardiologyres.org   editorial contact: editor@cardiologyres.org    elmer.editorial2@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.